Intrinsic Security
THREAT HUNTING AS A SERVICE

Most Breaches Aren't Caught by An Alert. They're Caught by Us.

Proactive, Hypothesis-Driven Threat Hunting That Finds Adversaries Already Inside

Automated tools only detect what they're configured to detect. Skilled adversaries know this, and operate accordingly — beneath the threshold, out of pattern, off the radar.

Intrinsic Security's Threat Hunting as a Service adds a human-led investigation layer, actively searching for hidden attacker behaviour using structured hypotheses grounded in MITRE ATT&CK. We don't wait for a rule to fire.

HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT MITRE ATT&CK • Threat Intel
TELEMETRY COVERAGE Endpoint • Identity • Network
CROSS-SOURCE INVESTIGATION Endpoint • Cloud • Identity
ATT&CK-MAPPED FINDINGS Confirmed • Ruled Out • Escalate
THREAT HUNTING
DETECTION ENGINEERING SHARPEN STANDING DETECTION
LIVE THREAT HUNTING Hypothesis-Driven Investigation Active
THE CHALLENGE

External Risk Moves Faster Than Periodic Reviews

A traditional SOC reacts to alerts. Essential — but not sufficient. Automated tools surface only what they've been built to see, while skilled adversaries deliberately operate between the rules.

Slow lateral movement, credential abuse, and living-off-the-land techniques can be engineered to stay silent and avoid conventional detection.

Many serious breaches are discovered through an external tip rather than an internal alert. By then, the organisation may already be managing a breach that has been live for days or weeks.

4 HUNTING CATEGORIES

Alert-Only Detection Leaves a Gap

Continuous visibility across infrastructure, brand, credentials, and underground activity enables organisations to identify and reduce external exposure before it can be exploited.

01
CONFIGURATION

Detection Is Bounded by Configuration

Automated tools detect known patterns. Adversaries who understand this build activity specifically designed to sit outside them.

02
DWELL TIME

Dwell Time Compounds Risk

The longer an adversary goes undetected, the more time they have for reconnaissance, escalation, and access — increasing eventual impact.

03
MONITORING BLIND SPOTS

Central Monitoring Has Blind Spots

An analyst can only act on what has already been flagged. Genuinely stealthy activity does not flag itself.

04
ASSURANCE

Compliance Expects Proactive Assurance

Frameworks such as ISO 27001 increasingly expect continual improvement and proactive incident management — not only reactive controls.

Hypothesis-Driven. Framework-Led. Always Improving.

Incident response starts with a known alert. Threat hunting starts earlier — with a hypothesis: a reasoned, testable assumption that hidden attacker behaviour or a detection gap exists, tested against real telemetry before any alarm has sounded.

01

Hypothesis Development

Every hunt starts with a specific, testable premise. Hypotheses draw on MITRE ATT&CK, current threat intelligence, and deep knowledge of the environment.

02

Telemetry Coverage Validation

Before the hunt begins, we confirm the environment holds the data needed: endpoint process and command-line visibility, identity logs, DNS and proxy data, authentication records, and cloud activity.

03

Cross-Source Investigation

Analysts pull evidence across endpoint, identity, network, and cloud — testing the hypothesis directly, not browsing logs hoping something looks wrong.

04

ATT&CK-Mapped Findings

Every result is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, giving a clear, defensible picture of what's been tested, what's confirmed clean, and what needs escalation.

05

Continuous Cadence

Hunts run on a recurring schedule, plus ad hoc whenever the environment changes, new threat intelligence lands, or an incident hits elsewhere.

Core Capabilities

A managed hunting capability combining hypothesis-based investigation, intelligence-led priorities, cross-domain telemetry analysis, ATT&CK mapping, detection engineering, and audit-ready reporting.

01

Hypothesis-Based Threat Hunting

Structured hunts built on specific, testable hypotheses grounded in MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques relevant to your sector.

02

Intelligence-Led Hunting

Hunt priorities set by live threat intelligence on adversaries and campaigns actively targeting your sector and region.

03

Custom & Situational Hunting

Hunts shaped by your specific context — prior incidents, recent risk assessments, geopolitical exposure, and findings elsewhere in your security programme.

04

Cross-Domain Telemetry Analysis

Investigation across endpoint, identity, network, and cloud — no single-source blind spots.

05

ATT&CK Coverage Mapping

Ongoing, defensible visibility into which adversary techniques have been actively hunted and ruled out.

06

Detection Rule Development

Confirmed findings converted into tuned detection logic, feeding straight into your SIEM.

07

Hunt Reporting & Audit Evidence

Clear documentation of hypotheses, methodology, findings, and outcomes — built for audit, not just internal record.

08

Takedown & Remediation Support

Structured support in coordinating the removal of fraudulent assets and guiding remediation of infrastructure exposure, backed by clear, actionable recommendations.

From a One-Off Exercise to a Continuous Assurance Model

A single hunt is a snapshot. A managed hunting programme is a continuous loop connecting findings, coverage, remediation, and audit evidence.

Reduced Dwell Time — Adversaries beneath the alert threshold get found by us, not by chance. Detection That Keeps Improving — Every hunt sharpens standing detection capability. Provable Coverage — Clear ATT&CK-mapped evidence of what's been tested. Audit-Ready by Design — Structured hunt records supporting ISO 27001 and equivalent expectations.

THREAT HUNTING

Assume Presence. Hunt Accordingly.

Waiting for an alert assumes your tools are already configured to catch what's in your environment. We start from a tougher assumption — that a skilled adversary may already be inside — and hunt accordingly.

Chat on WhatsApp